Descriptions of the sources are just as powerful:
When you train Albus on a source, he reads through minimal data in the beginning of the source to understand what your source is about.
In this process, it is possible that he does not understand the full document properly.
This is when your description of the source will be very useful provided you give a more fuller summary of what the source is about.
When you ask Albus a question, he will first check all the descriptions of sources and then use that information to search for an answer.
Unlike connections, you describe a source for all wikis. This is because the content of a source remains the same for all wikis. If someone writes a new description for a source, Albus overwrites the old description.
Albus already knows Notion allows you to maintain notes, databases, Kanban boards, knowledge bases, company documentation, etc.
But he does not know how your company specifically uses Notion at work. Perhaps, you use Notion to document all your company policies. Or it is where you post your job openings. Your teams might also be writing product documents and maintain release notes.
This is where descriptions come handy. When you describe how you use a connection at your workplace, Albus understands how your teams function better.
When you ask him a question in the future, he will use this description to do much more effective evaluations of where he should look for an answer - a Notion page, a Slack channel, a Jira project or something else.
You describe a connection for a particular team wiki not for all wikis. This is because you might be using a connection to achieve different goals in different functions.
Here’s a good example of a good description:
“We use Notion at work to maintain all our employee documents.
These include reimbursement policies, time-off policies, links to employee portals, credentials to corporate accounts on productivity apps
and more. The HR team also documents all company-wide announcements like townhall events in Notion.”
Action required, Added to sprint, Assigned, Awaiting Approval, Backlog, Bug opened, Build broken, Building, Contents Team, Design ready, Escalated, Feedback (External), Feedback (Internal), Goldman Sachs Approval, Goldman Sachs test, Goldman Sachs Testing, Implementing, In Progress, In Review, Internal Review, Internal Test, Internal Testing, Investigation, Itemised, Pending, Pending release, Product Team, QA, Ready for Dev, Ready for test, Sent for GS approval, Sent to implementation, Waiting for customer, Waiting for support, With Implementation, With Product
Approved for Implementation, Blocked, Blocked (external), Blocked (internal), Completed DPA, New, On hold, Open, Pending response, Pending response/On Hold (IMT), Reopened, Requested, Roadmap, Selected for Development, Submitted, To Do, Waiting for approval, Work in progress
Canceled, Closed, Declined, Done, Duplicate, Live, Rejected, Resolved
By incorporating a detailed description aligned with your Azure DevOps projects, you enhance Albus's ability to deliver accurate and relevant responses.